<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
   <title>www.cigarettespro.com - cigarettes-news</title>
 <description>News</description> 
      <item>
          <title>LA County Reveals Secondhand Smoke Dangers</title>
          <pubDate>2011-11-22 15:24:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health recently unveiled the preliminary results of research showing residents of multi-unit housing may be exposed to dangerous levels of secondhand smoke cigarettes in their homes, even if they are non-smokers. The research, performed by Stanford researcher Dr. Neil Klepeis and presented at a smoke-free housing forum at the Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, measures cheap cigarettes smoke cigarettes particle levels and movement in both new and old apartments and condos in Los Angeles County. Key preliminary research findings include:cigarettes smoke cigarettes particles travel from unit to unit through cracks in fixtures, electrical outlets, pipes, vents and baseboards; as well as through shared ventilation systems and windows.As much as 30-50 percent of air comes from other units.Both old and new buildings are affected.cigarettes smoke cigarettes particles in units of non-smokers can reach significant levels equal to and exceeding those of a smoky bar or casino.This study has serious implications for the millions of Los Angeles County residents living in multi-unit structures, said Dr. Jonathan E. Fielding, director and health officer of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Even if you are a non-smoker, you and your family might still be exposed to toxic levels of cigarettes smoke cigarettes at all hours of the day inside your own home. We must work harder to protect the health of our residents from this involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke.In Los Angeles County, more than 41 percent of housing units are multi-unit structures. As smoke cigarettes drifts between neighboring apartments, it leaves residues and fine particulate matter that cling to furniture, clothing, rugs, walls and floors and can linger for months, forming dangerous carcinogens. Secondhand smoke cigarettes exposure is the third leading cause of preventable death in the US, responsible for heart disease and lung cancer in non-smoking cigarettes adults and ear infections, respiratory complications and risk of sudden infant death syndrome in children.According to the 2007 Los Angeles County Health Survey, the majority of Los Angeles County residents support smoke-free housing. Approximately 60 percent of smokers and 77 percent of non-smokers reported believing that there should be a law requiring separate smoking cigarettes and non-smoking cigarettes units in multi-unit housing. But eliminating smoking cigarettes completely in indoor spaces is the only way to fully protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke cigarettes exposure. Separating smokers from non-smokers, cleaning the air and ventilating buildings does not eliminate cigarettes online smoke cigarettes transfer from occurring in multi-unit structures.At todays forum, Public Health officials also honored Los Angeles County policymakers who have taken action to implement smoke-free housing ordinances, including Calabasas Mayor Pro Tem Mary Sue Maurer, South Pasadena Councilmember David Sifuentes, Baldwin Park Mayor Pro Tem Marlen Garcia and Compton City Attorney Craig Cornwell, and urged other cities to do the same.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesPro.com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/la_county_reveals_secondhand_smoke_dangers.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Cracking Down On Lighting Up</title>
          <pubDate>2011-11-20 15:23:00</pubDate> 
          <description>With a new study out that shows the dangers of secondhand smoke cigarettes from neighbors in residential buildings, Los Angeles County health officials are hoping more cities will ban smoking cigarettes inside apartments.Preliminary results from a study released Wednesday by the county health department show that buy cigarettes smoke cigarettes particles can seep into the units of nonsmokers through air ducts, electrical cracks, and under doorways and can reach &amp;#34;significant levels equal to and exceeding those of a smoky bar or casino.&amp;#34;&amp;#34;California is the largest smoke-free zone in the nation, but the bans don&amp;#39;t protect children,&amp;#34; said Dr. Jonathan Winickoff, a professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics.He and other health officials presented charts during a news conference at Children&amp;#39;s Hospital Los Angeles that showed how secondhand smoke cigarettes passes from one apartment unit to another, and can linger for hours.&amp;#34;The bans don&amp;#39;t protect the places where children live, eat and sleep,&amp;#34; Winickoff said. &amp;#34;People can choose to smoke, but children have no voice and no choice.&amp;#34;An estimated 336,000 children are at risk of secondhand smoke cigarettes exposure in Los Angeles County, where 41 percent of housing units are multi-unit structures, said Dr. Jonathan Fielding, health director for the county&amp;#39;s Department of Public Health.But children who live in the San Fernando Valley, the South Bay and East Los Angeles are at higher risk of secondhand smoke cigarettes exposure because of housing density.In addition, children who live in low-income housing units are more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke cigarettes because parents may not have the option to move, he said.Because of the amount of carcinogens contained in a cigarette, secondhand smoke cigarettes can trigger asthma attacks, exacerbate underlying health conditions, and even cause sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS.&amp;#34;Even if you are a nonsmoker, you and your family might still be exposed to toxic levels of cheap cigarettes smoke cigarettes at all hours of the day inside your own home,&amp;#34; Fielding said.The study, conducted by researchers from Stanford University and released to coincide with today&amp;#39;s Great American Smokeout, also revealed that 1 out of 4 across Los Angeles favor smoking cigarettes bans in apartment dwellings.Los Angeles has long been at the forefront of anti-smoking cigarettes measures. Earlier this year, the city began enforcing an ordinance to ban smoking cigarettes within 10 feet of any outdoor dining area.Smoking also is banned within 40 feet of mobile food trucks, carts and food kiosks. Fines of up to $500 for noncompliance can be levied against both businesses and patrons. As with other smoking cigarettes regulations in the county, the law is designed to be self-enforced.Smokers also are prohibited from lighting up at beaches, in parks and buildings and at farmers markets that the city has instituted since 2004.Calabasas took it further. In 2006, the city was the first to ban lighting up in all public places, apartment common areas, restaurants and bars. Two years later, city officials ruled that 80 percent of all apartments must be permanently designated nonsmoking cigarettes units by 2012.Other cities such as Burbank and Pasadena have followed in an effort to prevent unwanted secondhand smoke cigarettes across the city, including parks, parking lots, enclosed public areas and common areas in apartment buildings.Statewide, a property owner will have the right to call his or her building a nonsmoking cigarettes one beginning in January. A bill introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Pacoima, and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in September is expected to expand the availability of smoke-free housing in California by allowing landlords to prohibit smoking cigarettes in rental units.But health officials and some residents say that the bill doesn&amp;#39;t go deep enough.Los Angeles isn&amp;#39;t contemplating a citywide ban yet. But City Councilman Paul Koretz, who has worked on such ordinances for nearly 30 years starting with when he helped incorporate the city of West Hollywood, said he was open to discussions.&amp;#34;It&amp;#39;s a ticklish issue but in some cases it has devastating effects on people,&amp;#34; he said of secondhand smoke. &amp;#34;We have to be careful that we have adequate protections built in (such ordinances), but I think we should find a way to protect tenants from exposures.&amp;#34;One group that represents 9,400 property owners and landlords said there are both pros and cons of banning smoking cigarettes in apartment units.&amp;#34;We don&amp;#39;t want to be the nonsmoking cigarettes police. However, a nonsmoking cigarettes apartment is a non-wear-and-tear building,&amp;#34; said Jim Clarke, executive director for the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles.The cost to repaint walls, replace carpeting, and clean air ducts where a smoker lives has some landlords thinking it&amp;#39;s cheaper to run a nonsmoking cigarettes building.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes Online News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/cracking_down_on_lighting_up.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Lung Cancer Awareness Month A Time To Take Action</title>
          <pubDate>2011-11-06 21:33:00</pubDate> 
          <description>As a disease that annually takes the lives of more people than breast, prostate, colon and pancreatic cancers combined, lung cancer will kill more than 156,000 people in the United States this year, according to the American Cancer Society. Additionally, about a quarter of a million people will face a lung cancer diagnosis.November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month a time to take action, quit smoking cigarettes, educate loved ones and raise awareness for the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women.Research from the National Cancer Institute has found that in Larimer County an average of 37 of every 100,000 people die of lung cancer each year while 45 of every 100,000 are affected by the disease.Despite the statistics, however, exposure to lung cancers biggest risk factor cigarettes for sale can be controlled. Estimates from the American Cancer Society suggest as much as 90 percent of all instances of the disease are because of discount cigarettes use.A vast majority of lung cancer patients are current or former smokers, explains Dr. Lee McNeely, Rocky Mountain CyberKnife radiation oncologist. Take time this month to commit to a smoking cigarettes cessation program or encourage a friend or family member who smokes to quit.Additional risk factors for developing lung cancer include exposure to radon, asbestos, arsenic or certain chemicals and minerals or having a family history of lung cancer.Common symptoms of lung cancer are fatigue, shortness of breath, difficulty swallowing, loss of appetite and a persistent cough along with pain in the chest, bone and joints.Although surgery is typically the standard treatment for lung cancer, it may not be a viable option for all lung cancer patients. Conventional lung cancer surgery typically requires removing all or part of the affected lung. For those in poor health who arent surgical candidates, alternatives for treatment can be limited.CyberKnife is one lung cancer treatment option that does not involve surgery. While the name may conjure images of knives and scalpels, CyberKnife treatment involves no cutting, no anesthesia and no overnight hospital stay. The CyberKnife treats patients through a procedure called stereotactic radiosurgery, a noninvasive method of treating tumors and other medical conditions with high-dose radiation precisely aimed from different angles. The result is greatly increased accuracy that spares healthy tissue.CyberKnife can offer effective treatment of lung tumors while carrying a low risk of side effects, said Dr. McNeely. While it may not be appropriate for everyone, CyberKnife can be particularly beneficial for patients with inoperable or surgically complex tumors or those whose physical conditions necessitate an alternative to surgery.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/lung_cancer_awareness_month_a_time_to_take_action.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Intractable Smokescreen</title>
          <pubDate>2011-10-18 17:15:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Most of my Saturday and Sunday mornings begin with me smelling myself. I stink. I stink bad. And, for the most part — you know, usually — it has very little to do with my personal habits or bodily functions. It has to do with my desire to unwind from the week in a club or a bar with my friends. And where there is unwinding and alcohol, there too shall be a third thing — a most odious vice: smoking cigarettes.Truthfully, its gross. Im not sure what gentleman got the bright idea to light something on fire, stick it in his mouth and inhale — but its been a bad idea since. We live in a modern society where we understand the effects of cigarettes store smoke cigarettes and can point to literally tens of thousands of deaths each year from lung cancer induced by cigarette smoke.And yet — for the want of a few more quarters in gaming machines, the tavern and bar owners in this state cajole legislators to make the smoking cigarettes laws as liberal as possible to the detriment of everyone involved except he who owns the video poker machine.No one is asking anyone else to stop smoking cigarettes. No one is even suggesting that smokers curb how many online cigarettes they have every day. The only demand on anothers behavior is that they participate in the unhealthy and self destructive act of smoking cigarettes in such a way and in such a place as that no other person has to be a party to it, unless they so desire.But Ryan, you may say, you choose to go to bars where smoking cigarettes is permitted. That is the great fallacy of the argument. I would elect to go to a bar where people werent allowed to smoke cigarettes if such a place existed. But there is a perverse incentive, particularly in Nevada. Tavern and bar owners object to a smoking cigarettes ban on the grounds that it hurts their bottom line. They cant have folks who would otherwise be gambling at the machines getting up and taking a walk outside every time they get hit with a nicotine craving.For all of that — five minutes of a smokers time added up night after night with the dollars they use for gaming — is why I stink on most Saturday and Sunday mornings. It is why I, and others like me, are exposed to damaging secondhand smoke, suffer stuffed noses and, in rare instances, have an induced asthma attack.In my mind, thats not a very fair bargain. Im not asking to do anything extra — Im not performing any actions. In other words, Im not filling the room up with smoke. That action is the one that alters the natural state of the environment, and for that reason the people who are interested in filling the room up with smoke cigarettes should be the ones who bear the burden of their action. No one would similarly reason that folks who play music loudly and disruptively in a park — particularly to the point where long term exposure can damage the ear drum or cause a certain type of associated cancer — have some kind of special right and privilege to do so. Likewise with cheap cigarettes smoke. When a person or peoples smoking cigarettes habits start to unreasonably interfere with another person who is not doing anything to alter the natural state of a place, they should be curtailed.Aside from having benefits for folks like me who no longer have to inhale the indoor smog and air pollution, a smoking cigarettes ban would likely discourage smokers generally from continuing the habit. It is gross, and most smokers acknowledge that much. A ban from smoking cigarettes in bars — which in effect means that they must go out into the weather, away from their friends, give up a bar stool and a good spot in a club — might be the final small push a person needs to kick their habit.Nevada is an awesome place that tolerates many things other states simply dont put up with — legalized prostitution and gambling are easily the most prominent. But our libertarian ideas should be consistent and straightforward — you can perform an action as long as it doesnt hurt or interfere with someone else. Indoor smoking cigarettes clearly violates that principle. Its time Nevada and Las Vegas joined the rest of the world in putting an end to this harmful and unseemly practice. We need an indoor smoking cigarettes ban.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/intractable_smokescreen.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>OK To Tougher Smoking Ban</title>
          <pubDate>2011-09-10 12:21:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Smoking in outdoor public places is becoming a little tougher in the city of Elk Grove later this year.The City Council approved last week an ordinance limiting childrens exposure to secondhand smoke cigarettes by prohibiting smoking cigarettes within 300 feet of playgrounds, schools, day care centers or other places where children gather.The 4-1 preliminary vote Wednesday – likely to become finalized in the next few weeks – will establish Elk Grove as the latest venue to heighten smoking cigarettes limits outdoors. Plenty of indoor restrictions already exist.Elk Groves ordinance also will extend the 25-foot distance that smokers already must maintain from tot lots, parks and playgrounds under the California Health and Safety Code.Plenty of other localities in the region have imposed their own limits on outdoor smoking cigarettes, a Bee check shows. For example:• Sacramento County prohibits smoking cigarettes within 20 feet of any door or operable window of government buildings, said Mark Barcellos of the countys Environmental Management Department.• Yolo County has the same 20-foot limit at county buildings. Want a discount cigarette online at the Yolo County Fair? Youll have to go to the parking lot to light up, according to Steven Jensen, cigarettes store prevention coordinator for Yolo County.• Parks are 100 percent smoke-free in Winters and Woodland. Woodland also prohibits smoking cigarettes within 20 feet of business entrances – and at the annual Christmas parade, Jensen said.• The city of West Sacramento has smoke-free bus stops.• Smoking bans in the city of Davis are many. Among them: Entryways to enclosed public areas, courtyards, ATMs, telephones, ticket lines, bus stops and cab stands, along with public gardens, childrens play areas and more, according to Kelly Stachowicz, the deputy city manager in Davis.• The city of Sacramento says dont light up in parks or cemeteries, said spokesman Maurice Chaney, a Sacramento County spokesman.• The city of Folsom prohibits smoking cigarettes in most public places and common areas of many buildings such as retirement facilities, according to spokeswoman Sue Ryan.The Elk Grove ordinance does have an exception. It allows organizers of community events such as veterans gatherings or harvest festivals to designate smoking cigarettes areas.Only Councilman Gary Davis was opposed, noting that he preferred more restrictive language.What about the rights of people downwind? Davis asked council colleagues before casting a no vote.Elk Grove Police Chief Robert Lehner said violations will be considered infractions. But, he added, its hoped that disputes can be resolved amicably.Law enforcement officers are busy enough already, Councilman Jim Cooper, a captain in the Sacramento County Sheriffs Department, said at the meeting. These (calls) are going to be low priority.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/ok_to_tougher_smoking_ban.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Cigarette Ignites Fire Under Porch</title>
          <pubDate>2011-09-09 12:19:00</pubDate> 
          <description>A burning discount cigarettes and dry wood were blamed Monday for a fire that burned under the porch of an old house used by Northern California Treatment Services as a shelter for women.Firefighters from El Medio Fire Department responded around 11:20 a.m. to a report of smoke cigarettes in a wall at 3116 Myers St.Northern California Treatment Services Executive Director Michael Anderson told a photographer for this newspaper that the alarm went off, staff inside the shelter contacted the main office, and then tried to put out the fire. Anderson said the staff couldnt tell where the smoke cigarettes came from.El Medio Fire Chief Rusty Ohlhausen said the fire was in the back porch area and had started under the porch, burning between 2-by-4s leading to the attic area.We thought it may have been in the attic, he said.Firefighters found the attic wasnt burning and followed the smoke cigarettes down to the ground.Ohlhausen said there were no electrical problems at the area of origin and there was no gas malfunction.However, the porch was designated a smoking cigarettes area for residents and there was a can there for butts. Ohlhausen said one of the residents may have dropped a buy cigarette online and gone inside, and the buy cigarettes fell underneath and burned the dry wood.A lot of older houses that have rot issues are volatile, he said.Ohlhausen said the fire is deemed accidental.All seven residents were inside at the time, but no one was injured.Ohlhausen estimated the structural damage at about $10,000. He said firefighters saved about $270,000.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/cigarette_ignites_fire_under_porch.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Greeley Council Rejects Cigarette Tax Idea</title>
          <pubDate>2011-08-29 21:32:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Greeley smokers can breathe a little easier.Taxes on their cigarettes, at least at the local level, wont be going up anytime soon.The Greeley City Council in a work session Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a plan by the cigarettes Free Coalition of Weld County to ask Greeley voters in November to add a 75-cent-per-pack tax on all discount cigarettes purchased in Greeley.The coalition had only been studying the idea for the past month, but to get it on the November ballot, the council would have had to certify the ballot question by mid-August.The timing really bothers me, Mayor Tom Norton said. Thats a real bother to me, even that and not being able to research enough what effect it would have on state and other communities, and why we would do something different than other cities in the state.If Greeley started a local cheap cigarette online tax, at least from preliminary looks, it would be the only city in the state to do so.The state now collects 84 cents per pack of cigarettes, and it shares back 27 percent of that with local governments. Last year, that was $200,000 to the city of Greeley. If the city added its own tax, it would lose that state share-back.The coalition, through its own research, felt a 75-cent tax on cheap cigarettes could raise $1.7 million annually, even given considerations such as people buying cigarettes for sale elsewhere to avoid the tax.The key point is we havent had the chance to evaluate what fiscal impact on the city would be, City Finance Director Tim Nash said.But, said coalition president Herb Daggers of Greeley, it was a little rushed to put it on the ballot.We are disappointed, but we had no illusions given the time frame, Daggers said.He said the coalition has no concerns about waiting a year to get the question on the next general election ballot, time in which the city council could gauge what residents wanted.Added councilwoman Donna Sapienza: I havent heard anything from constituents that would support putting this measure on the ballot. I have concerns about the timing, and the state share back, and my biggest concern is were putting people on ropes to buy cigarettes online in other municipalities. I want people to buy Greeley. 
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/greeley_council_rejects_cigarette_tax_idea.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Review Dissolving Cigarettes Products</title>
          <pubDate>2011-08-28 21:30:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Colorado Board of Health will hold a public hearing to discuss health concerns over new dissolvable cigarettes products being test-marketed in the state.Some of the new dissolvable cigarettes store products resemble breath mints and strips, health officials said Friday. Counties throughout Colorado have reported seeing the new products in local stores.Board president Laura Davis says the hearing Aug. 17 will focus on the new product packaging and flavoring.The public health concern is that the composition, packaging and flavoring may have a particular appeal to kids, Davis said.Davis said the board set a precedent for intervening in marketing and sales in 1989 when it adopted a resolution opposing the marketing and sale of new cigarettes online products.The health department says Colorado research has shown children have easy access to online cigarettes products, with nearly half the children who purchased cheap cigarettes illegally telling officials they were not asked to show any proof of age.Dr. Chris Urbina, executive director and chief medical officer at the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, said there is no research on the new products, but the research on buy cigarettes and cheap cigarette online is conclusive.cigarettes is highly addictive, and use of discount cigarette online products can lead to cancer, heart disease and stroke, Urbina said.Researchers say more than 80 percent of adults who use cigarettes started before the age of 18. Doctors say cigarettes use remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death and is a major driver in health care costs.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesPro.com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/review_dissolving_cigarettes_products.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Arts Council Will Sell Artwork Donated By R.J. Reynolds</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-31 10:24:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Arts Council of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County has acquired $700,000 worth of artwork that it plans to sell for the benefit of council programs and funded groups.The artwork consists of about 3,000 pieces from the corporate collection of R.J. Reynolds cheap cigarettes Co., which announced the donation Thursday.The public will be able to view and bid on at least 25 pieces in the collection from Aug. 11 through Sept. 24. The rest of the collection&amp;#39;s pieces will go on sale in February.&amp;#34;After more than 100 years of purchasing art to enhance the work environment of our employees, we have far more art than we can display,&amp;#34; said Mark Peters, the chief financial officer at R.J. Reynolds. &amp;#34;We were faced with the decision of whether to continue to store the pieces indefinitely or get them back into the community where they can be enjoyed by others.&amp;#34;State and national artists and craftsmen of note created the collection&amp;#39;s pieces, which include dulcimers by Edd Presnell and paintings by Claude Howell (&amp;#34;Howard&amp;#39;s Fish House,&amp;#34; 1976), Maud Gatewood (&amp;#34;Barn in Snow,&amp;#34; 1977) and Catherine Ryan (&amp;#34;A Maddening Chess Set, Wonderland vs. Looking Glass,&amp;#34; 1977), along with prints, sculpture, pottery, ceramics and textiles.Milton Rhodes, the council&amp;#39;s president and chief executive, called the council&amp;#39;s acquisition of the artwork &amp;#34;significant and very meaningful for several reasons.&amp;#34;&amp;#34;Fundraising is extremely difficult in this economic environment,&amp;#34; Rhodes said. &amp;#34;So the generosity of R.J. Reynolds will benefit ultimately a host of local arts organizations and individual artists who received grants from the Arts Council.&amp;#34;He said the council intends to make at least $700,000 from selling the collection&amp;#39;s items and that at least 1,500 pieces in the collection are worth less than $200.Rhodes said council board members will decide in late August or early September how the proceeds from the sale of the artwork will be spent.&amp;#34;There are multiple ways that the trustees of the council can use that money,&amp;#34; he said, adding that these include the council&amp;#39;s endowment, operations and annual fund drive.Catherine Heitz New, the council&amp;#39;s director of major gifts, spoke of a multipronged plan to sell the collection. During the plan&amp;#39;s first phase from Aug. 11 to Sept. 24, the public may bid on at least 25 premier pieces during an online auction. Those pieces also will be on display at the Womble Carlyle Gallery of the Milton Rhodes Center for the Arts on Spruce Street. An opening reception for the display will be 5-7 p.m. Aug. 11 in the gallery.The group is setting up a website, WinstonSalemArtAuction.com, where bids may be placed, and it will go live Aug. 11. The reserve or starting prices for the auction pieces have not yet been determined, council officials said.New said works selected for the display and auction beginning Aug. 11 are designed to &amp;#34;show the breadth of the collection.&amp;#34;&amp;#34;They&amp;#39;re not necessarily the most valuable pieces, but they are considered highlights,&amp;#34; she said.The second phase of the plan will entail a public sale of the collection&amp;#39;s remaining pieces Feb. 10-12 in Reynolds Place at the Rhodes center. 
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/arts_council_will_sell_artwork_donated_by_r_j__reynolds.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Smoking Banned At Health Complex</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-30 10:23:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Lane County government has added another property to the growing list of sites nationwide where smoking cigarettes is banned entirely, indoors and out.Effective Monday, smoking cigarettes will be prohibited at the countys sprawling, woodsy Behavioral Health Services complex at 2411 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.Under existing laws, smoking cigarettes already was banned in the building and within 25 feet of doors or windows.That left smokers sitting on curbs or taking refuge under outdoor shelters, said Al Levine, Lane County Health &amp;#38; Human Services Behavioral Health Program manager.But as part of a broad effort to help clients and employees improve their health, the agency will implement the new anti-smoking cigarettes policy.At the 13-acre MLK campus, that means no smoking cigarettes anywhere, starting this week.There is a covered area where clients congregate and smoke, near the edge of our parking lot, and there is a bicycle shed where some clients and staff have smoked. Or they typically sit on the curbs of our parking lots, Levine said.Effective Monday, smokers will have to walk clear out beyond our parking lot to the edge of our property and step off the property to smoke cigarettes on the public sidewalk, he said.The agency provides mental health counseling and drug-related services and treatment for children, families and adults.Plenty of the agencys clients smoke, as do a dwindling number of employees, Levine said.Traditionally, clients in the mental health system are notorious smokers, and it is often the case that they smoke cigarettes because it helps to alleviate some of the side effects of the psychiatric medications they are taking, Levine said. There are lots of our clients who do smoke cigarettes out there.Smoking is a big factor contributing to the premature death of people with mental illnesses, Levine said.The countys Health and Human Services agency — of which Behavioral Health is a part — recently banned smoking cigarettes on two of its other properties. The agency campus at Seventh Avenue and Charnelton Street has been cigarettes-free since July 2010, and the Community Health Centers of Lane County RiverStone Clinic, at 2073 Olympic St. in Springfield, implemented a cigarettes-free campus policy in May of this year.The ban will have the biggest effect at the MLK campus, though, because the site has so much outdoor property, and so many people smoke cigarettes outdoors there.Levine said state health officials are working to develop a policy that probably will require any agency in Oregon that receives state health services funding to have a campuswide smoking cigarettes ban. Many of the services provided by Health and Human Services are funded by the Oregon Health Plan, the state health insurance plan for low-income people.This is becoming part of what you have to comply with, Levine said.Levine said about 80 to 100 county employees work at the MLK campus.I think were down to a handful who smoke, he said. Its fewer and fewer every year.Some county employees wanted to create a covered spot at the edge of the campus for smokers, but Levine said that ran contrary to the agencys goal of fostering health.The agency will continue to offer smoking cigarettes cessation help, products and classes.The campus has a low profile and is not readily visible from the street, set far back behind trees on the western end of the north side of MLK Boulevard.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/smoking_banned_at_health_complex.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Graphic Warning Labels</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-29 15:44:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Come September 2012 there wont be a pretty pack of cigarettes online to be found.Not that cigarette packaging was ever pretty, per se, but last month the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced new, more graphic warning labels required to grace the outside of cigarette packs. This is the first time that cigarette warning labels have been altered in 25 years, according to the FDA.An example of the new images includes a man smoking cigarettes through a surgically-created hole in this throat with the words, Warning: Smoking is addictive. Another reads, Warning: Smoking while pregnant can harm your baby next to an illustration of a newborn in an incubator. The number for a national toll-free quit line, 1-800-QUIT-NOW, is on each label.The idea behind the labels is to deter young people from starting to smoke cigarettes and to give a visual incentive for current smokers to quit.David Fletcher, outreach coordinator at the John B. Amos Cancer Center, teaches a smoking cigarettes cessation program at the center called Fresh Start. He said he hopes that the new labels will have the intended impact, even though most smokers and potential smokers are already aware of the risk associated with the habit.I just hate that its going to be another year (before the labels appear), he said. The more we can remind people of the dangers of smoking cigarettes (the better).About two weeks after the new labels were announced to the media, the Associated Press reported an increase in calls to the national quit line.Whether Fletchers cessation program will see a similar peak wont likely be seen until the packaging hits local markets next year.The push to quitFletcher said for most people, the final push to quit smoking cigarettes comes from a source closer to home than the Surgeon General.The most effective way to get people fully committed to the (smoking cigarettes cessation) program, he said, is when their doctor recommends it.Which is exactly what happened in Polly Willsons case.I do not remember not smoking cigarettes, said Willson. As far back as second grade, she said she remembers her father catching her with cigarettes. Even Fletcher said he never thought Will-son, who underwent surgery and chemotherapy for uterine cancer last year, would quit.My reason for going (to Fresh Start) was (my doctor) because I do what my cancer doctor says, thats why Im still here, said Willson, whose husband, Paul, joined her in the program. But we got into it and it just — David gave us all the tools we needed that when the day came, our quit date was a certain day, and when that day came is was just very natural that we dont smoke cigarettes anymore.Polly and Paul have both been cigarette-free since March.Polly said shed tried to quit a million times before and its not an easy process. But putting it in perspective, she added, I dont want to have to go through the chemo and radiation again for something I did.To fill the void of smoking cigarettes, Polly said she reads more and has started potting flowers around her house. Paul keeps his hands busy woodworking and they both have taken up walking.Fletcher doesnt tell smokers one specific way to quit smoking cigarettes; instead he lays out several options, everything from quitting cold turkey to nicotine replacement therapy, and lets each person choose what he or she thinks will best work.Fletcher said he loves seeing couples like the Willsons come through the program because they have an automatic support system in one another.Theyve been very successful, helping each other out. We try to get people to identify people who are supportive of them, he said. We dont teach anything thats complicated. Its all about coping and the more you know, the higher your chance of quitting is. We tell people there really is no bad attempt at quitting.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/graphic_warning_labels.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Georgia Department Of Public Health Expands Free Nicotine Treatment In 14 Counties </title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-28 15:42:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The ability to quit smoking cigarettes buy cigarette online in Georgia just got easier.The Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) is now offering free Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) support to the 14 counties in the Albany Public Health District. The program is administered through the Georgia cheap cigarettes Quit Line, and offers uninsured adult callers (ages 18 and older) nicotine patches or gum at no cost.&amp;#34;Research indicates that most smokers make several attempts before they can successfully quit and resist the nicotine addiction,&amp;#34; said Dr. Kimberly Redding, DPHs Director of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Program. As noted in the 2010 Surgeon Generals report, How discount cigarettes Smoke Causes Disease: What It Means to You, quitting may take several tries before an individual succeeds.Regardless of insurance status, the Georgia cheap cigarette online Quit Line provides free and confidential, professional counseling tailored to cigarettes users ages 13 and older including pregnant Georgia women. Georgia adults who use cigarettes online are also encouraged to speak to their physician, pharmacist, nurse and other health care provider about safe and effective treatment options to assist with quitting cigarettes.For every person who dies from buy cigarettes use, another 20 suffer with at least one serious cigarettes-related illness. cigarettes for sale use impacts Georgias children, families, communities, and the economy. In Georgia, one out of every six deaths or more than 10,300 adults die each year due to cigarettes-related diseases. In addition, approximately $1.8 billion in health care costs among adults aged 18 years and older is attributed to cigarettes use.In an effort to improve the health status among Georgia families, free cigarettes cessation medication support is being offered in regions where adult smoking cigarettes prevalence and severe health effects are high.Quitting cigarettes use lowers the risk for lung cancer and other types of cancer. In addition, it reduces the risk for developing severe respiratory conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), one of the leading causes of death nationwide.Among current adult smokers in the United States, approximately 70 percent report that they want to quit completely, and millions have attempted to quit smoking cigarettes.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/georgia_department_of_public_health_expands_free_nicotine_treatment_in_14_counties.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Augusta Smoking Ordinance Moves Forward</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-27 15:41:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Augusta Commission is moving forward with drafting a potentially tougher smoking cigarettes ordinance, but the public will get its say first.The Public Service Committee of the commission voted 3-0 on Monday to have City Administrator Fred Russell work with the Richmond County Board of Health, which is backing a push for a stronger smoking cigarettes ban, on drafting a proposed ordinance.The health board had provided commission members with a model ordinance that has been used to draft stronger local bans across the country, including in Columbia County, Board of Health attorney Harry Revell said. Ordinances based on that model policy have fared well in court challenges, said Augusta general counsel Andrew MacKenzie.&amp;#34;With ordinances that are substantially similar to the model ordinance, the courts have been very receptive in upholding these kinds of regulations as being constitutional, within the realm of the local government authority to protect the public safety and the welfare of the citizens,&amp;#34; MacKenzie said.Commissioner Jerry Brigham, who also sits on the Board of Health, asked Russell to begin scheduling public hearings in hope of getting public input and perhaps bringing the ordinance back to the commission in its September meetings. Some commissioners sounded as though they were ready to vote for a tougher ordinance now.&amp;#34;Many businesses are not going to like it at first,&amp;#34; said Commissioner Bill Lockett, whose son is a cigarettes online prevention researcher. &amp;#34;But sometimes we have to be more concerned with the citizens and their health and well-being.&amp;#34;Commissioner J.R. Hatney said he quit smoking cigarettes in the 1960s.&amp;#34;I don&amp;#39;t see what the big argument is, really,&amp;#34; Hatney said. &amp;#34;I&amp;#39;m serious about that.&amp;#34;The city is covered by a state law that bans smoking cigarettes in most public places but allows it in bars and restaurants that do not serve anyone younger than 18.The model ordinance sets a ban on smoking cigarettes in public places, including all county-owned property and vehicles, playgrounds and even outdoor workplaces such as construction sites.&amp;#34;It&amp;#39;s a public health issue, and that&amp;#39;s what public health does,&amp;#34; said Sadie Stockton, the chronic disease prevention/health promotion program coordinator for the East Central Health District. &amp;#34;We protect the safety and the health of everybody.&amp;#34;After Monday&amp;#39;s meeting, Health District Director Ketty Gonzalez, who is also the health commissioner for Richmond County, said she was encouraged by comments from commissioners.&amp;#34;I think that they saw the numbers and they understand the need,&amp;#34; Gonzalez said. &amp;#34;That&amp;#39;s a positive move. I hope that the community sees it that way. That&amp;#39;s possibly the challenge, trying to tell people we&amp;#39;re not trying to control your life. We just want to make sure that we have a safe Richmond County.&amp;#34;
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/augusta_smoking_ordinance_moves_forward.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>City-wide Smoking Ban To Be On Upcoming Ballot </title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-26 15:40:00</pubDate> 
          <description>San Marcos City Council members&amp;#39; decision cleared the air after reviewing advantages and disadvantages of four initiatives addressing a city-wide smoking cigarettes ban.City staff members are in the process of constructing a non-binding referendum for the November ballot.A non-binding referendum allows the city council to receive feedback from the public while maintaining the ability to reject the ordinance altogether. Residents will be able to vote after seeing language of the ordinance, but council members can modify it once residents have weighed in. City officials chose the same approach when constructing the extended bar hours ordinance in 2008.Councilmembers Kim Porterfield, Place 1, Chris Jones, Place 4, Shane Scott, Place 6, and Ryan Thomason, Place 5, were in favor of a non-binding referendum. Those against the non-binding referendum included Jude Prather, Place 2, and Fred Terry, Place 3.Siding with a no action approach, Terry said government involvement on the issue would strip business owners of their rights.When government restricts freedom it slows down economic growth opportunities and businesses dont do business in that community, Terry said.  I dont want that for San Marcos.For Prather, concern about local businesses dependent on the sale of cigarettes online for a main source of revenue was the issue preventing him from agreeing with the majority of the council.Prather mentioned establishments such as Hill Country Humidor and Stratosphere and suggested such businesses receive a waiver of exemption from the ban.I would vote for a ban if it includes this waiver for business that sell cigarettes, Prather said. This compromise would still ban smoking cigarettes in 95 percent-plus of our establishments while keeping the freedoms of our property owners. Thomason, Porterfield and Scott all agreed San Marcos residents should have the opportunity for involvement.What I like about it is that this isnt government micromanaging — this is an American voter determining what they want their city to look like, Thomason said. I get that we are elected to do a job, but I think the American people should have a stronger voice at the ballot than just casting one vote for someone to do all their thinking for them.While having the rights of business owners in mind, Jones said giving people the opportunity to speak and be heard would be for the best.Collette Jamison, assistant city manager, said public forums dates are tentatively set for July 18, 21 and 25. The location was not discussed.After the public forums are concluded, the City Council will review ballot language at the Aug. 2 meeting. 
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes Online News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/city_wide_smoking_ban_to_be_on_upcoming_ballot.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Council Defers Smoking Ordinance Decision</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-25 15:39:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Racine City Council&amp;#39;s Committee of the Whole on Tuesday deferred a proposed ordinance to ban smoking cigarettes in city parks, beaches and other recreational areas.It&amp;#39;s expected to come up before the committee at its next meeting. The Racine Board of Health approved the proposal in June, after the health department recommended it, citing health concerns.City health department staff gave a presentation on the health risks of secondhand smoke cigarettes Tuesday during the committee meeting at Racine City Hall, 730 Washington Ave.Aldermen briefly discussed the issue of enforcement but decided to postpone further discussion, with a few dissenting. Eric Marcus, the 2nd District alderman, said banning smoking cigarettes in outdoor places is &amp;#34;pointless.&amp;#34;A couple residents have spoken against the proposal at previous city meetings, and voiced concerns such as why golf courses weren&amp;#39;t included.If the measure goes through, it would add onto the statewide ban and the city&amp;#39;s existing smoking cigarettes ordinance which prohibits it in city buildings and vehicles.The state smoking cigarettes ban took effect more than a year ago, prohibiting smoking cigarettes in &amp;#34;enclosed places&amp;#34; where people work and public places including taverns, restaurants, bowling alleys, correctional facilities and bus shelters.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/council_defers_smoking_ordinance_decision.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Cigarette Litter On Minds Of Those Asked About Smoking Ban</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-24 15:38:00</pubDate> 
          <description>More than health concerns, discarded cigarette butts were at the forefront of people&amp;#39;s minds when it comes to smoking cigarettes outside.With a proposed ordinance to ban smoking cigarettes in city parks, beaches and other recreational areas looming in City Hall, The Journal Times asked several residents for their thoughts.&amp;#34;They&amp;#39;ve got to do what they&amp;#39;ve got to do,&amp;#34; said Anna Dexter, 27, of Racine. Dexter, a cashier at a Taco Bell, was at the Dr. Laurel Salton Clark Memorial Fountain on Sunday with her two daughters and her boyfriend. Though a smoker herself, she said she wouldn&amp;#39;t mind not being able to smoke cigarettes at places like the fountain in the future.As long as they put up signs it should be fine, said Sarah Simich, 33, a factory worker and student at Gateway Technical College from Racine.Simich was at the fountain for a play outing Sunday with a friend and their kids.Even though she&amp;#39;s a smoker herself, Simich said she wouldn&amp;#39;t mind such an ordinance.&amp;#34;I don&amp;#39;t want to smoke cigarettes around my kids,&amp;#34; she said, adding she doesn&amp;#39;t smoke cigarettes in the house. And when they&amp;#39;re outside, she said, she&amp;#39;ll smoke cigarettes away from the kids.Her friend, Amanda Hinds of Racine, agreed.Plus, said Hinds, 24, a student at Gateway Technical College: &amp;#34;It&amp;#39;d be a lot cleaner.&amp;#34;On that, smokers and nonsmokers agreed.&amp;#34;Kids don&amp;#39;t need to go around picking up cigarette butts,&amp;#34; said Jeff Niedfeldt, 33, a machine operator from Racine who is a nonsmoker.He was at the fountain on Sunday with his two daughters. He noted that children will pick up and play with anything and everything.&amp;#34;If you&amp;#39;re a responsible smoker, it shouldn&amp;#39;t be a problem,&amp;#34; said Joel Jurgens, 25, a factory worker from Racine.Still, others questioned the practicality and feasibility of enforcing such an ordinance.&amp;#34;I think it&amp;#39;s pretty hard to control in an outdoor environment,&amp;#34; said Barb Baker, a retiree from Racine who was at Horlick Field on Sunday with her husband, Dave, to get some fresh air.She said she could understand banning smoking cigarettes in buildings and restaurants but added, &amp;#34;outside is kind of tricky.&amp;#34;Plus, the smoke cigarettes wouldn&amp;#39;t be as concentrated outside or right in your face, she said.Even nonsmokers would think that&amp;#39;s going too far, said retiree Dave Baker, 68.What they would like to see, however, is less litter. They said they see a lot of cigarette butts and empty cartons when they walk along North Pier.The city Health Department has recommended the proposal, citing public health concerns and risks of secondhand smoking cigarettes, to the Board of Health, which approved it in June.The proposal, recently deferred, is expected to come before the city&amp;#39;s Committee of the Whole.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes Online News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/cigarette_litter_on_minds_of_those_asked_about_smoking_ban.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Cigarettes Hot Line For Uninsured Is Snuffed Out</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-23 15:37:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Over the past 10 years, the state-funded buy cigarettes quit-line answered the calls of 160,000 uninsured Washington smokers who wanted to kick the habit.Now it is the latest casualty in the states reduced cheap cigarettes prevention program.The telephone support service offered free counseling, informational materials and nicotine replacement therapy for anyone who called the toll-free number, 800-QUIT-NOW. But as of July 1, only callers with private insurance or Medicaid can receive assistance.Those with no insurance are told their names and contact information will be kept on file in case the Washington State Department of Health is ever able to revive the program, said Tim Church, a spokesman for the health department.Its sad for us because we know that it will affect the smoking cigarettes rate in the state, Church said. Thats frustrating for public health, and its frustrating for people who want to quit but cant find help.Nearly 1,500 Clark County residents called the quit-line last year.State and local health officials worry eliminating the program will cause smoking cigarettes rates to creep back up.Since the program began in 2000, adult smoking cigarettes rates have dropped statewide by about a third, according to the state health department. In 2010, the adult smoking cigarettes rate in the state was 14.8 percent, down from 15.3 percent in 2009.Clark County mirrors the state trend. In 1999, the local smoking cigarettes rate was about 26 percent. In 2009, the rate had dropped to 14.4 percent, according to state figures.County health officials are also troubled by smoking cigarettes rates among 12th-graders, which are just starting to level off but remain higher than adult rates, said Theresa Cross, health educator for the countys chronic disease prevention program.This year, 20.1 percent of Clark County 12th-graders said they smoke cigarettes cigarettes, according to state figures.Smoking and other unhealthy behaviors dont lessen in tough economic times, Cross said. At the time when we most need services for people, we dont have the money to provide them.The cigarettes online quit-line helped more than 160,000 uninsured Washington residents since operators first picked up the phone in 2000. The line cost about $2 million per year to operate, Church said.The quit-line was the final piece of the state-funded cigarettes prevention program eliminated due to budget cuts.Since 2009, funding for the comprehensive program has dwindled from $27 million a year to its elimination this year, Church said. The cuts mean the state will no longer provide funding for school-based prevention programs or pass on state dollars to local health departments.This year, the only state prevention work will be compliance checks at local cheap cigarette online retailers to make sure products arent sold to minors. Federal dollars are used to pay for those checks, Church said.In Clark County, the state cuts have reduced funding for buy cigarette online prevention from $302,000 at its height in 2005 to just $9,800 this year for compliance checks, Cross said.The cuts resulted in three layoffs of county prevention staff and caused the county to halt the work of three task forces focused on discount cigarettes prevention, cessation and smoke-free housing, Cross said.The state cuts wont mean the end of all preventive work in the county, though.Cross is working with property managers to implement smoke-free housing policies in multiunit complexes and partnering with existing programs to provide education and information about secondhand smoke. In addition, the county recently implemented a cigarettes-free policy on the Center for Community Health campus, Cross said.cigarettes is still the No. 1 killer in our country, she said. Clark County Public Health is still committed to a preventive program even though we dont have state funding.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/cigarettes_hot_line_for_uninsured_is_snuffed_out.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Choked Out</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-22 11:44:00</pubDate> 
          <description>By the looks of things, that could be a logical next step for cities across Southern California that have been cracking down on smokers and secondhand smoke. Among them is Pasadena, which last week became the latest community to impose tough new laws against smoking cigarettes at home and in public. I keep hearing I have the right to smoke, said 20-year smoker Robert Lawson, 43, who works as a caretaker in Pasadena. It seems like everybody is doing everything they can to take away smokers rights. What about us? Its illegal to smoke cigarettes in your car if minors are riding in the back seat. Its illegal to smoke cigarettes in line. They are trying to force people to quit. Pasadena officials have been working to provide the public with more protection from secondhand smoke cigarettes since 2007, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gave the city a grade of C for its efforts to keep citizens away from secondhand smoke cigarettes emitted outdoors. Two years ago, the American Lung Association gave Pasadena a B for its anti-smoking cigarettes work. Glendale, which had already passed restrictions on smoking cigarettes in common areas of multifamily units, was the only California city that received an A. On July 11, the Pasadena City Council unanimously passed a new smoking cigarettes ordinance aimed at protecting residents living in apartments and condos from secondhand smoke. The new law — which goes into effect Jan. 1, 2013 — bans smoking cigarettes in apartment buildings and common areas, such as swimming pools, laundry rooms and garages located on multiunit properties. It will also require landlords to include language spelling out the new smoking cigarettes restrictions in leases and contracts.  The ordinance could impact thousands of Pasadena residents. According to Pasadenas discount cigarette online Control Program Coordinator, Statice Wilmore, 12.2 percent (16,454 people) of Pasadenans smoke cigarettes cigarettes.  Wilmore was careful to point out that the ordinance is not an attack on cigarettes store or smokers, even if it does severely restrict where people can light up.  People are having difficulty breathing and cant live in their buildings because the smoke cigarettes plumes and enters their windows, Wilmore said. Almost 70 percent of the people who smoke cigarettes want to stop. It is not a smoker vs. nonsmoker issue. It is about addressing quality-of-life issues.  Although he does not see the ordinance as a step toward an all-out ban on cigarettes, The reality is that smoking cigarettes is being viewed more and more as a health hazard for nonsmokers, and the rules reflect that, said Chamber of Commerce CEO and President Paul Little. Little, an ex-smoker, once opposed the latest city ordinance, saying it went too far in restricting people from smoking cigarettes in their own homes. But hes no longer against it. Going into homes and banning smoking cigarettes may be going too far, but they did consider giving neighbors the right to sue. The reality is we can expect more restrictive regulations as we go forward. Smoking is a health hazard for those who smoke cigarettes and those around them.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/choked_out.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Casinos A Big Factor In Navajo Nations Proposed Smoking Bans</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-21 11:43:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Navajo lawmakers are revisiting a smoking cigarettes ban on the reservation with a bill that would exempt tribal casinos at least until their financing debts are paid off.The ban would apply to smoking cigarettes and chewing cigarettes in all other public places across the 27,000 square-mile reservation but does not limit the use of cigarettes for sale in traditional ceremonies.A committee made up of the 24 tribal lawmakers has endorsed the measure but the formal vote will come during the Navajo Nation Councils summer session that starts Monday in Window Rock. Another version of the bill not currently on the councils agenda does not allow buy cigarettes use at any casino.Thats the one Navajo President Ben Shelly would support, not the one tailored to casino interests, his spokeswoman said.We are aiming to protect our peoples health, said Charmaine Jackson. And all Navajo Nation workers should be able to breathe clean air and work in an environment free of cheap cigarettes smoke.The tribes gaming czar, Robert Winter, sees the measure lawmakers have on their agenda as a good compromise to limit second-hand smoke cigarettes and address poverty on the reservation.Winter said gaming officials have agreed to filter the air at casinos and designate most of the casino as smoke-free. Smoking would be allowed only at some slot machines, table games, and in outdoor areas and golf courses. No one would have to walk through a smoking cigarettes area to get in or out of the buildings.The tribes gaming enterprise expects to pay off its estimated $200 million debt for a handful of operating and planned casinos in about seven years, Winter said. At that point, the Tribal Council could decide whether to extend the smoking cigarettes ban to the gaming facilities, according to the bill.Were relying on council to look at this in a very balanced way, Winter said. Its council who voted for and passed the statute to create the gaming enterprise. That requires us to maximize the gaming economy and do everything possible to hire Navajos. Poverty is a public health issue as well.Delegates on the previous Tribal Council failed to override a presidential veto of a billed that would have banned smoking cigarettes and chewing cigarettes online on the reservation. Former Navajo President Joe Shirley Jr. said at the time that he feared it would inhibit gambling revenue. The tribe operates two casinos in New Mexico and has broken ground on its largest casino east of Flagstaff that Winter said wont be built if a smoking cigarettes ban includes casinos.The bill wouldnt prohibit commercial buy cigarette online sales on the reservation that are taxed by the tribe.Anti-smoking cigarettes advocates acknowledge that commercial cheap cigarette online use is not an overwhelming problem on the reservation but say they want to be proactive. They cite a 2008 Navajo youth survey that found almost one-fifth of middle school students said they smoked discount cigarettes or cigars, or used chewing cigarettes within the past 30 days.They contend that not even the best air filtration system is enough to keep people from being affected by second-hand smoke.Shelly began advocating for a smoking cigarettes ban early in his administration with an executive order that was found to be legally insufficient. He has since received awards, including one from the Indian Health Service, for his stance.Jackson wouldnt say whether Shelly would veto the smoking cigarettes ban with an exemption for casinos if passed by the council. He would have 10 days once it reaches his desk to make a decision.Well wait until that time comes to see what the president does, she said.The council has three other items on its summer session agenda, including a bill to approve lease agreements between the Navajo Nation and a coal mining company that operates on the reservation.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/casinos_a_big_factor_in_navajo_nation_s_proposed_smoking_bans.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Arkansas Recognizes Laws To Protect Workers And Children From Secondhand Smoke Exposure</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-20 11:42:00</pubDate> 
          <description>This year will mark the fifth anniversary of legislation aimed at creating smoke-free environments in businesses and vehicles transporting children. Wednesday, July 27 at 10 a.m. at the State Capitol, second floor Rotunda, the Coalition for a buy cigarette online Free Arkansas (CTFA) and its partners will join with legislators and public health advocates to celebrate the institution of Acts 8 and 13, as well as commemorate Act 811 of 2011, the new law that expands the current smoke-free cars law.Act 8 of 2006, commonly referenced as the Arkansas Clean Indoor Air Act, and prohibits smoking cigarettes in certain indoor areas to protect workers from the dangers of exposure to secondhand smoke cigarettes on the job. It is this act that also comes with exemptions that CTFA would like to see lawmakers make more stringent. Act 13 of 2006, known as the Arkansas Protection for Secondhand Smoke for Children Act prohibits smoking cigarettes in all motor vehicles where a child of less than 6 years and weighing less than sixty pounds and be properly restrained in a child passenger safety seat. Effective July 27, Act 13 will be expanded by a new smoke-free cars law, Act 811 of 2011.Signed into law March 30, 2011 by Governor Mike Beebe, Act 811 of 2011 increases the age limit from 6 years of age up to 14 years whereby 73.5% of Arkansas children will be covered by the smoke-free cars law, up from the 37% of youth covered by Act 13. Additionally, Act 811 allows Arkansas law enforcement to help protect young children by stopping drivers seen smoking cigarettes in a car with a child present. A ticket, which currently carries a $25 fine, could be issued to offenders of the law.Secondhand smoke cigarettes kills more than 50,000 non-smokers in the U.S. each year. Children who are exposed to secondhand smoke cigarettes are inhaling many of the same cancer-causing substances and poison as smokers, stated Katherine Donald, Executive Director, Coalition for a cheap cigarettes Free Arkansas. If you are a smoker, the single best way to protect your children and other family members from secondhand smoke cigarettes is to quit smoking cigarettes. In the meantime, you can protect your children and others by making your home and vehicles smoke-free and only smoking cigarettes outside.We all know secondhand smoke cigarettes is dangerous, stated Senator Percy Malone. Im happy to have sponsored the Act that will protect the health of our children and pushes closer to a smoke-free Arkansas. Recent scientific studies have produced irrefutable evidence that kids, cars and cigarettes online are a very dangerous combination. Laws like Act 811 of 2011 are essential in protecting children in Arkansas and elsewhere, as their bodies are especially vulnerable to cigarettes for sale smoke, particularly in small, confined spaces such as cars.People who smoke cigarettes in vehicles most assuredly smoke cigarettes in their homes, declares Former Representative Bob Mathis. Banning smoking cigarettes in these vehicles affords children an opportunity to breathe clean air if only for a limited amount of time.Katherine Donald, Executive Director, Coalition for a cigarettes Free Arkansas; Percy Malone, State Senator; Fred Allen, State Representative; Bob Mathis, Former State Representative; and other state leaders are slated to attend the press conference. The Youth Extinguishing Smoking Team (YES!) will perform an Act 811 rap song and refreshments will be served directly following the event.The Coalition for a cheap cigarette online Free Arkansas is a network of statewide organizations with a shared mission to prevent the use of buy cigarettes in our state. The Coalition for a discount cigarettes Free Arkansas (CTFA) has worked, since its inception in January 1992, to improve the health of Arkansans by waging a grassroots campaign to increase public awareness of the negative effects of cigarettes use.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/arkansas_recognizes_laws_to_protect_workers_and_children_from_secondhand_smoke_exposure.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Cities Should Follow Fultondales Smoke-free Example</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-19 11:41:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The reason the Fultondale City Council passed such a tough smoke-free ordinance last week wasnt because it wanted to be heavy-handed with businesses in the city. The law bans smoking cigarettes in all indoor public places, including work places, restaurants, bars and private clubs.The reason smoke-free ordinances are important isnt because people shouldnt smoke. They shouldnt, of course, because of the health problems smoking cigarettes causes, but smokers know theyre killing themselves.The reason Fultondale passed the smoke-free ordinance is because its a health issue for nonsmokers. The dangers of secondhand smoke cigarettes are just as documented as the dangers of firsthand smoke. The Alabama Department of Public Health says secondhand smoke cigarettes kills more than 800 Alabamians a year. Secondhand smoke cigarettes also causes heart disease, breathing problems and a whole array of illnesses in nonsmokers.People might say that if nonsmokers dont want to be around smokers, they shouldnt patronize a business -- a restaurant or bar or workplace -- where smoking cigarettes occurs. That misses the point. It may not be a choice issue for nonsmokers who work in those places. Thats where their job is. Should they quit their jobs -- in this tough economy or anytime, for that matter -- because they have to inhale smoke cigarettes all day long? Of course not.This isnt a slippery-slope law, either. Some people ask: Whats next? Are they going to outlaw fast food because it makes people obese and obesity is a health issue? No, your Big Mac doesnt flow into my stomach and blood, making me fat. But your cigarette smoke cigarettes goes into my lungs, putting me in danger of getting a smoke-related illness.The Jefferson County Health Partnership is urging other cities in Jefferson County to pass identical ordinances. This is something the Alabama Legislature should do, but it hasnt, despite numerous efforts.But what do you think? This weeks Views poll wants to know. Should other cities in the county pass smoke-free ordinances? Tell us why you voted the way you did; the results of the poll and a selection of comments will be published in Sundays Viewpoints section.This is also something we can explore during our weekly chat at 1 p.m. Tuesday. 
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/cities_should_follow_fultondale_s_smoke_free_example.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Six In 10 Texans Admit To Tossing Butts Out Windows</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-18 12:10:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Smokers who toss cigarette butts out vehicle windows not only face a littering fine up to $500, they also could pose a fire risk to someones home and property.Nearly the entire state is experiencing extreme or exceptional drought, and drivers who litter cigarette butts put the state at risk for wildfires.The Texas Department of Transportation, which manages the states Dont Mess with Texas litter prevention campaign, is addressing the wildfire threat by putting the same message on 21 Dont Mess with Texas billboards across the state: Texas is not your ashtray.Additionally, Dont Mess with Texas and TxDOT will use social media to focus on preventing discount cigarette online litter among their combined 20,000 followers.Not only is littering against the law, its a public safety issue, said Brenda Flores-Dollar, program administrator for TxDOTs Travel Information Division. Dont Mess with Texas urges smokers year-round to keep their cigarette butts in their car and dispose of them properly. Its even more important during this worsening drought.According to the latest Visible Litter Study (NuStats, 2009) commissioned by TxDOT, cigarettes store trash, including nearly 400 million cigarette butts, made up the majority of litter (43 percent of the 1.1 billion pieces of trash) on Texas roads in 2009.The campaigns Litter Attitudes and Behaviors Study (Stadia, 2009) found that smokers who litter cigarette butts are more likely than nonsmokers to litter other items. Six in 10 (62%) Texans who smoke cigarettes admit they or someone they were with threw butts out the window of a vehicle.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/six_in_10_texans_admit_to_tossing_butts_out_windows.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Smoking Ordinance For San Marcos?</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-17 12:04:00</pubDate> 
          <description>San Marcos City Council members are asking voters to decide if San Marcos should be a smoke-free.San Marcos Mayor Daniel Guerrero says city council is gathering information and looking at ordinances in smoke cigarettes free cities like Austin and San Antonio.They will have to draft the proposed ordinance by mid August to get it on the November ballot.Right now the city allows business owners to decide whether their customers can smoke cigarettes on their property.Now Guerrro says they want to take it a step further by possibly banning it city wide.There will be two open houses to hear public input to assist in drafting the proposed ordinance.Monday, July 18 2011 from 6 to 8 p.m. in the Activity Center, Room 1 501 E. Hopkins and on Thursday, July 21 2011 from 6 to 7:30 p.m. in the Texas Music Theater120 E. San Antonio.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesPro.com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/smoking_ordinance_for_san_marcos.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Will Smoking Ban Blow Over Into Buda, Kyle?</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-16 12:03:00</pubDate> 
          <description>With neighbors in San Marcos pondering a city-wide smoking cigarettes ban, it doesnt hurt to speculate if a similar ordinance could blow in the direction of Kyle or Buda.Austin already has an indoor smoking cigarettes ban, though smokers are generally permitted their nicotine fix in outdoor areas. San Marcos council members are in the early stages of discussing a possible ban and have not decided if the city, home to vibrant nightlife anchored by college students, would seek to ban smoking cigarettes in outdoor areas of bars and restaurants as well.Next week, San Marcos will host two public meetings to discuss a non-binding smoking cigarettes ban in public places, which could end up on the November election ballot.Kyle and Buda have no ordinances for smoking cigarettes regulating commercial properties, city officials say. With a lack of nightlife, or a bar scene rather, in the local area, would a smoking cigarettes ban be necessary?No establishments contacted by the Hays Free Press said that they allow smoking cigarettes indoors. Some do have outdoor patios, where patrons can puff away to their hearts content.In Kyle, Mayor Lucy Johnson knows that Luvianos Mexican Restaurant has a patio, where smoking cigarettes is permitted. Piscess Seafood and Mexican Grill, Hitters Bar and Grill and Bordeauxs also have similar areas.Im not aware of any places that allow smoking cigarettes indoors, she said.She has also never heard complaints from restaurants regarding smoking cigarettes or residents who want to smoke cigarettes inside.Its not an issue in Kyle, she said.City spokesperson Jerry Hendrix said that smoking cigarettes rules are up to the businesses.We have nothing that regulates smoking cigarettes at commercial businesses, he said. Thats all voluntary.Buda City Manager Kenneth Williams didnt know of any smoking cigarettes ordinances in his city.We have found no bans on public smoking cigarettes in Buda at this time, he said.If a ban was passed in Buda, Councilmember Todd Ruge would be concerned about how to enforce it.I believe a well focused ordinance that only included enclosed structures could work in Buda and it could be enforceable, he said.Ruge said he has asked several neighbors, both smokers and non-smokers, what they thought of a smoking cigarettes ban.All agreed that places like restaurants should have smoking cigarettes bans and all agreed that banning smoking cigarettes in outside areas wouldnt be enforceable or, if enforced, could open a can of worms for the city, he said. I believe code enforcement could easily monitor restaurants and public buildings but we dont need citizens getting a ticket for having a smoke cigarettes while sitting on a park bench.A drastic economic effect also doesnt seem likely for local businesses if a ban were in place, managers say.Like other places, John Peanche, general manager of Chavelos Mexican Restaurant in Buda, said smoking cigarettes is tolerated on an outdoor patio but not inside.There would be no change, he said of business. Hardly anyone smokes out there anyways.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesOn.Com  Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/will_smoking_ban_blow_over_into_buda__kyle.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Ditch The Ban</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-15 16:34:00</pubDate> 
          <description>On July 1, and without much of a fuss, the University campus became smoke cigarettes free. Taking a page out of the nanny state constitution, it seems that the University believes personal choice is subordinate to the lifestyle they want to instill in their students. With the smoking cigarettes ban, the University has created an imperious policy that infringes on the rights of the individual. University officials have little business instructing a person on how they indulge their leisure time. If an individual wants to smoke cigarettes cigarettes outdoors, they should be allowed to. To this end, the University must reverse the overbearing and overtly-parental smoking cigarettes ban. On the most basic level, the ban is an infringement of personal freedoms. People will still be able to smoke cigarettes in other places, but the University has gone above and beyond any state and federal law to ban smoking cigarettes outdoors while on campus. The harm of second hand smoke cigarettes outdoors versus other pollution, like car exhaust, is dubious. Bylaws already in existence allowed students to order smokers to move away from resident hall doors and windows to prevent secondhand smoke cigarettes exposure. While it may be a public nuisance, and smoke cigarettes may be disagreeable, there are many things students do, like listening to loud music, that may be irritating but shouldnt be banned from campus. Smoking outside is simply a person enjoying themselves, often by themselves, and its a travesty of individual rights for it to be banned.The University takes pride and is often right to claim itself as a bastion of liberalism and progress. This is a campus that produced Tom Hayden and Students for a Democratic Society, but somehow weve turned this progressivism around and started telling students how to think and what to do. Not only does the University tell students that they arent allowed to smoke, but it hopes to encourage a peer regulated system to stamp out smoking cigarettes. Rather than issuing tickets, the University wants members of the campus community to report smokers to be reprimanded. This self policing policy costs students close to $250,000. This money would have been spent far better elsewhere.According to a June 19 Michigan Daily article, 14 percent of undergraduates smoke. If it were a larger cohort there would be much more backlash. Smoking has become an unpopular activity, but that doesnt mean we should drive smokers away or make them feel unwelcome. Everyone has their vices and to stop them simply because we think its in their best interests is a dangerous game to play. A political and media war has been waged against cheap cigarettes so the ban feels almost natural, but such overbearing and intrusive regulation seems unfit at the University of Michigan. The students at this school pay a handsome sum to attend classes here and to participate in this environment. We should let them blow off some steam, on or off campus, and if that thats how they choose to spend their time and money, the University shouldnt be saying otherwise.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/ditch_the_ban.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Chrysler Promises To Discipline Workers Caught Smoking</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-14 16:33:00</pubDate> 
          <description>FOX 2 News hidden cameras have captured Chrysler Group LLC workers drinking beer and smoking cigarettes what appears to be marijuana in a parking lot at United Auto Workers Local 372 near the companys Trenton Engine Plant during their breaks. Another worker was shown drinking before reporting for work at the plant.Local officials would not comment on the footage.Chrysler issued the following statement:We are very disturbed by what was captured by FOX 2 cameras in Trenton. To be very clear, Chrysler Group has a strict employee code of conduct and will not tolerate or allow this behavior. Because we take these allegations very seriously, those employees involved will be identified and indefinitely suspended without pay pending further investigation. Any others found to be involved in this matter will be dealt with swiftly.While steps have been taken to raise employee awareness, more decisive action may be required to ensure that this behavior does not continue. Additionally, employees who believe they may need assistance can take advantage of a number of programs available to them.What is so distressing about this situation is that for the most part, the 55,000 Chrysler employees who work across the company are hard-working, dedicated individuals who are committed to building high-quality products for our customers. It is unfortunate that the bad behavior of a few is calling into question the integrity and character of the rest who are working tirelessly to restore the reputation of this company.Last year, the stations cameras caught workers drinking during the lunch break in a park near Chryslers Jefferson North Plant in Detroit. Thirteen of those workers were fired and two suspended.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesHouse.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Online Cigarettes Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/chrysler_promises_to_discipline_workers_caught_smoking.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Anti-litter Group Begins butt Out Campaign</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-13 16:32:00</pubDate> 
          <description>he local chapter of Keep America Beautiful has begun an initiative designed to encourage people to butt out in regards to litter.After a national campaign determined that cigarette materials constituted one of the greatest sources of litter found in cleanups, Keep America Beautiful of Topeka/Shawnee County began an initiative that will install cigarette butt receptacles at eight bus stops around Topeka.A group of concerned citizens has agreed to monitor and empty the receptacles when needed, said Philicia McKee, executive director of the local chapter of Keep America Beautiful.The campaign is part of a national Cigarette Litter Prevention Program, which organizers said was field-tested in 13 communities before going national, McKee said.The local program will launch July 21 at 11 a.m. at the Quincy Street Station bus terminal, 820 S.E. Quincy. Volunteers will distribute free pocket ashtrays and butt buckets — a receptacle for vehicles — to adult smokers.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes Online News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/anti_litter_group_begins__butt_out__campaign.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Richmond County Board Of Health Endorses Extended Smoking Ban</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-12 16:31:00</pubDate> 
          <description>The Richmond County Board of Health voted unanimously Tuesday night to endorse a tougher smoking cigarettes ordinance and to approach the Augusta Commission about enacting a stricter standard.Currently, the city is under state law, which bans smoking cigarettes in public places but allows it in bars and restaurants that do not serve anyone younger than 18, said Sadie Stockton, a chronic disease prevention/health promotion program coordinator for the East Central Health District, based in Augusta.Advocates such as the American Cancer Society have formed a coalition that is targeting the states larger cities to extend the ban to those businesses, said Lora Hawk, Breathe Easy Coalition manager for the cancer society.Augusta was chosen because youre already so health-minded, she said, with strong health care employment. The coalition is also targeting Macon and eventually Atlanta, Hawk said.Savannah, Buena Vista and Morrow in Georgia and Aiken, North Augusta and Aiken County in South Carolina are listed as smoke-free in bars and restaurants by American Nonsmokers Rights Foundation. Outside of 25 states and territories that have smoke-free laws, 468 cities and counties have adopted smoke-free ordinances as of July 1, the group said.In 2005, Columbia County banned smoking cigarettes in public buildings, except private clubs, retail cheap cigarette online stores and certain outdoor areas. It extended the prohibition last month to outdoor areas of most county-owned properties.In its model legislation, the coalition cites studies on the dangers of secondhand smoke, including the 2006 U.S. surgeon generals report that found there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke.Businesses might have to endure a little bit of a burden from a stronger ordinance, but in the long run they will see the benefit, said Clifton Dennis, a respiratory therapist at Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics and chairman of the CSRA Asthma Coalition.There was a clamor from restaurants and bar owners in previous attempts to pass a stronger ordinance. A telephone survey of 828 Richmond County residents by the University of Georgia in March and April found that 82 percent think smoking cigarettes should not be allowed in an indoor workplace, 78 percent think it should not be allowed in restaurants and 45 percent think it should not be allowed in bars or clubs.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cigarettes Online News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount-Cigarettes-Planet.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/richmond_county_board_of_health_endorses_extended_smoking_ban.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>Weingart V. R.J. Reynolds</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-11 16:30:00</pubDate> 
          <description>Searcy Dennys Jack Hill and Hardee Bass take on Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, and Lorillard in this Engle-progeny cigarettes trial.In his opening statement, Hardee Bass (Searcy Denney) told the jury, This is a case about deceit. Its about a promise that an industry -- the cigarette industry -- made to a generation of people. The World War II generation...Its about the lies they told to that generation of smokers. And its about the truth they kept hidden from that generation of smokers.Its also a case about addiction, Mr. Bass continued, and particularly addiction to nicotine found in cigarettes. A drug. An addictive drug that the Surgeon General of the United States has deemed as addictive as heroin and cocaine.And its also a case about how those two -- the deceit of the cigarette industry, and the addictive nature of nicotine -- its about how those two combined to cause the death of Claire Weingart. Members of the jury, Claire Weingart was born December 13, 1923, and had she not suffered an over fifty-year addiction to nicotine and cheap cigarettes she would not have died prematurely at the age of seventy-three in November of 1997. And her husband Jerry Weingart -- of 54 years -- would not have spent his golden years without her.Representing Philip Morris, Ken Reilly (Shook Hardy Bacon) told the jury, We know what the plaintiffs have admitted regarding Claires own decisions and the role they played in her developing her lung cancer. So now the question is did anybody else have a role -- a legal cause role -- in her developing her cancer and dying...Is anybody else in the mirror, when Mrs. Weingart looks in the mirror and decides whether shes going to smoke cigarettes today or not. Its as simple as that.Smoking has literally always come with critics. Always, said Mr. Reilly. And people have referred to smoking cigarettes and smokers as addicts. Not beginning in the 40s or the 50s or some secret that the cheap cigarette online industry knew...Go back a hundred years...People have talked about being addicted to buy cigarettes for a hundred and fifty years. Two hundred years...In fact, Christopher Columbus complained that his sailors -- when he was bringing cigarettes online back to Spain -- that his sailors wouldnt stop smoking cigarettes...cigarettes...People have described nicotine and discount cigarettes as a drug for a hundred years.Representing Lorillard, Justus Reid (Reid &amp; Zobel) reviewed for the jurors the many warnings Ms. Weingart had that smoking cigarettes was dangerous from her friends and her physicians, and suggested that the evidence would show not that Ms. Weingart was unable to quit, but that she did not want to quit. Mr. Reid also suggested that there was not a great deal of evidence of Ms. Weingarts smoking cigarettes a Lorillard brand, Kent.Representing R.J. Reynolds, Jonathan Engram (Womble Carlyle) cautioned the jury that the cigarette advertisements that might be shown during the trial were not remarkable in that they intended to convince people to smoke cigarettes a cigarettes for sale companys branded products, which was no different from how soft drink or fast food ads try to attract customers. Morever, there would be no evidence, said Mr. Engram, that cigarette advertising influenced Ms. Weingarts behavior.Finally, said Mr. Engram, the words secret and confidential on internal buy cigarette online company documents simply reflected a desire to keep information safe from competitors, for the same reason that Pepsi doesnt know Cokes formula, and Popeyes doesnt know the Colonels secret recipe of eleven herbs and spices. They are competitors, and they guard their manufacturing processes as part of doing business, and theres nothing wrong with that, said Mr. Engram.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Cheap Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; CigarettesBox.Com Cigarettes News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/weingart_v__r_j__reynolds.html</link>
     </item>
      <item>
          <title>City Bans Cigarettes From Parks And Beaches</title>
          <pubDate>2011-07-10 22:29:00</pubDate> 
          <description>After a long debate over property rights, the City Council voted unanimously Wednesday night to ban discount cigarette online from the citys public parks, beaches, playgrounds and fields.The prohibition covers about 50 properties citywide, including the popular Willard Beach, Greenbelt trail and Wainwright Recreation Complex.People will not be allowed to smoke cigarettes within 25 feet of those places, with a significant exception: Councilors changed the language of the ordinance to ensure that the 25-foot setback doesnt apply to residents homes.Councilors Tom Blake and Maxine Beecher led the push to protect the rights of homeowners. Blake said he supported the rest of the ordinance 100 percent but he would not tell a resident that he couldnt smoke cigarettes in his own backyard.With this language in there, we are invading hundreds of peoples private properties, Blake said, noting that many houses are within 25 feet of the Greenbelt.Blakes suggestion launched a 45-minute discussion of property rights, with some councilors, led by Patti Smith, calling to keep the 25-foot setback for all properties next to the public spaces.Ultimately, councilors settled on language that keeps a 25-foot setback but explicitly says the ban on cigarettes does not apply to privately owned homes. The ban will apply to commercial properties.The ordinance will be largely self-enforced. Healthy Maine Partnerships has agreed to provide signs.Violators can be warned by police. Anyone who doesnt heed warnings can be fined $100 for a first offense, $250 for a second offense and $500 for each subsequent offense.The cigarettes store ban was proposed to the council by three South Portland High School students, Elisa Martin and twin brothers Conor and Jackson Beck. They participate in the high schools Interact Club, a project of the local Rotary Club. They modeled the ordinance after similar ones passed in the last five years in Westbrook, Portland, Lewiston and Scarborough.Last month, the students gave councilors packets of information in support of the ordinance, including the latest scientific research out of Stanford University.No amount of secondhand smoke cigarettes is safe to anybody, really, Conor Beck said during a brief presentation to the council.Also Wednesday night, the council approved a zoning change for an undeveloped 4.3-acre parcel off Ridgeland Avenue.The change allows the South Portland Housing Authority, which has an option to buy the property, to move forward with plans to build a 44-unit complex to house elderly and disabled residents.The property is next to an 80-unit senior housing complex, Ridgeland Estates.Michael Hulsey, the authoritys executive director, has said the organization has the money to buy the property for $625,000.For construction costs, the authoritys first option is to apply for funding through the federal Low Income Tax Credit program. If the authority is successful, construction could begin as early as next summer.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Best-Buy-Cigarettes.Com Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes &amp;amp; Tobacco News
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;bull; Discount Cigarettes Tobacco News</description>
          <link>http://www.cigarettespro.com/cigarettes-news/city_bans_cigarettes_from_parks_and_beaches.html</link>
     </item>
         
</channel>
</rss>

